My blog: feel free to steal this button!

RSS Feed Subscription

Social Bookmarking Services


Archives

Featured

Past Blogs
Current Blog


My RSS 2.0 Newsfeed

My RSS 2.0 Newsfeed


My YouTube Channel

Twitter

Facebook

Flickr

LinkedIn

Tumblr


The Agenda with Steve Paikin

The Huffington Post

SoundCloud


Oxford University alumni

St Edmund Hall, Oxford alumni

United Nations University alumni


The Royal Society of Arts

The Royal Asiatic Society

The Royal Canadian Geographical Society


UNICEF Team Canada

Governor General's Horse Guards Cavalry Squadron

MGB Roadsters


United Nations Children's Fund

Amnesty International Canada


Creative Commons

PGP Public Key

Friend of a Friend Protocol


 

Maclean's 50: NATO Hanging in the Balance
25 January 2008, 18h55 EST (GMT-5)
http://www.maharaj.org/blog/2008_01_25.shtml

Maclean's 50
The Maclean's 50
Click logo for the full commentary and original article

John Manley's report on Canada's mission in Afghanistan has predictably set all and sundry wondering what it means for the Conservative government that commissioned it, and the Liberal Party that Manley once aspired to lead.

In my contribution as a member of the Maclean's 50, however, I argue that the more vexed question is what the report's demand for more troops means - or ought to mean - for NATO.

My full commentary published at the Maclean's web site is below. The original article and companion commentaries are available by clicking here.

* * *

The question of how NATO states react to a demand for additional troops for Afghanistan should do far more than decide the future of Canada's role in the war; indeed, it should decide the future of NATO itself.

The very essence of NATO is the doctrine of mutual defence of its members, by its members. Even after the end of the Cold War, countries have clamoured ever more ardently for membership in the alliance that regards an attack against any member as an attack against all members.

Yet, in Afghanistan, the vast majority of NATO states have revealed an abject hypocrisy: they are all too happy to cower under an umbrella of security held over their heads by the sacrifice of others, including the wholly disproportionate casualties being borne by Canadian soldiers.

If our NATO partners are not prepared to live up to their obligations today, they should not expect Canada or others to recognise any obligation to them tomorrow.


 

My Blog » To return to my main blog page, please click here.


Share this article through Facebook » To share this article through your Facebook page, please click here.

Subscribe to this article » To subscribe to my blog, please click here.

My iTunes Podcast » To subscribe to my podcast, please click here.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


















Privacy Policy
Akaash Maharaj - Breaking News

 

NATO & the Judgement of Paris

 

My article on military options against Daesh


Television appearances

TVO's The Agenda
 

My panel on corruption in the political and corporate classes


Radio interviews

United Nations
 

My address in the UN General Assembly Chamber


Feature articles

Huffington Post
 

My letter to PM David Cameron, on behalf of the global parliamentary alliance

   
 
iTunes Podcast
 
My YouTube Channel
 
My Twitter Tweets
 
My Facebook Profile
 
My Flickr Photo Album
 
My LinkedIn Profile
 
My Tumblr Page
 
My RSS 2.0 Newsfeed