My blog: feel free to steal this button!

RSS Feed Subscription

Social Bookmarking Services


Archives

Featured

Current
Jan 2008
Dec 2007
Nov 2007
Sep 2007
Apr 2007
Mar 2007
Feb 2007
Jan 2007
Dec 2006
Nov 2006
Apr 2006
Mar 2006
Feb 2006
Jan 2006


My RSS 2.0 Newsfeed

My RSS 2.0 Newsfeed

My RSS 2.0 Newsfeed


Flickr

Maclean's 50


Liberal Blogs

Progressive Bloggers

Green Bloggers


Blogging Canadians

Non-Partisan Bloggers

Red Ensign Brigade

Canadian Heroes

Ontarian Blogs


Oxford University alumni

St Edmund Hall, Oxford alumni

United Nations University alumni


UNICEF Team Canada

Governor General's Horse Guards Cavalry Squadron

MGB Roadsters


UNICEF Canada

Amnesty International Canada


Creative Commons

Friend of a Friend Protocol

Dublin Core Metadata


 

Maclean's 50: NATO Hanging in the Balance
25 January 2008, 18h55 EST (GMT-5)
http://www.maharaj.org/blog/2008_01_25.shtml

Maclean's 50
The Maclean's 50
Click logo for the full commentary and original article

John Manley's report on Canada's mission in Afghanistan has predictably set all and sundry wondering what it means for the Conservative government that commissioned it, and the Liberal Party that Manley once aspired to lead.

In my contribution as a member of the Maclean's 50, however, I argue that the more vexed question is what the report's demand for more troops means - or ought to mean - for NATO.

My full commentary published at the Maclean's web site is below. The original article and companion commentaries are available by clicking here.

* * *

The question of how NATO states react to a demand for additional troops for Afghanistan should do far more than decide the future of Canada's role in the war; indeed, it should decide the future of NATO itself.

The very essence of NATO is the doctrine of mutual defence of its members, by its members. Even after the end of the Cold War, countries have clamoured ever more ardently for membership in the alliance that regards an attack against any member as an attack against all members.

Yet, in Afghanistan, the vast majority of NATO states have revealed an abject hypocrisy: they are all too happy to cower under an umbrella of security held over their heads by the sacrifice of others, including the wholly disproportionate casualties being borne by Canadian soldiers.

If our NATO partners are not prepared to live up to their obligations today, they should not expect Canada or others to recognise any obligation to them tomorrow.


 

My Blog » To return to my main blog page, please click here.


Share this article through Facebook » To share this article through your Facebook page, please click here.

Subscribe to this article » To subscribe to my blog, please click here.

My iTunes Podcast » To subscribe to my podcast, please click here.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

















Privacy Policy

 

UNICEF Team Canada Triumphs

 

Multiple gold medals at the 2008 FEI International Tent Pegging Championships


Television

TVOntario's The Agenda
 

Steve Paikin's panel grills me on the Liberal Party's reply to Tory electoral brinksmanship.


Newspaper articles

The Globe and Mail
 

"Mr. Maharaj has made it to the top tier of one of the world's most obscure and challenging sports."


Radio

Radio 1's The Current
 

I join a national panel on the decline of public discourse to argue that the end is not yet nigh.

   
 
iTunes Podcast
   
 
My Facebook Profile
   
 
My RSS 2.0 Newsfeed